Return to AMS Posters, Table of Contents
|
||
| ||
2. USDA-ARS U.S. Southwest Water shed Research Center, Tucson, Arizona, USA | ||
| |
2. INSTRUMENTATIONAn intensive network of vadose zone monitoring equipment was installed: ten water content reflectometery (WCR) probes, and three nests of four tensiometers were installed on both sides of the San Pedro River at Lewis Springs (Figure 2). | |
The tensiometers and WCR probes were installed at the water
table interface and in the capillary fringe to monitor diurnal, seasonal
and flood-induced fluctuations in soil moisture and soil matric potential
within the cottonwood-willow forest gallery (i.e near-stream riparian biome
-see Figure 4). The tensiometers and WCR probes were wired to a datalogger to collect measurements every 30 minutes. Additionally, six neutron probe access tubes (NPATs) were installed on either side of the San Pedro River to supplement the automated soil moisture data. The locations of these NPATs are identified in Figure | |
3. PRELIMINARY RESULTSWCR probe soil moisture data and tensiometer matric potential data show both immediate and delayed responses to increases in stream stage. The data for two high-flow events are shown: a 38 cm stream stage increase on Julian Day 219 (August 7, 1997), and a 90 cm stream stage increase on Julian Day 221 (August 9, 1997). Figure 5 shows changes in soil moisture measured using WCR probes from the west trench. Diurnal fluctuations and an immediate response to an increase in stream stage are evident. Although the stream stage decreases sharply within 24 hours, the riverbank maintains a higher soil moisture for several days. The diurnal fluctuations exhibited by the WCR probes may reflect the evapotranspiration cycles of the cottonwood and willow trees in the SPRNCA. However, it may also be an artifact of the probes' sensitivity to temperature. The WCR probe data has not yet been normalized to 20E C. Additionally, the probes have not yet been calibrated for the soils in which they are installed; a standard polynomial provided by the manufacturer was used in the interim to discern relative changes in soil moisture. | |
Figure 6 shows fluctuations in soil matric potential measured using tensiometer data from nests D, E and F located on the east bank of the San Pedro River (see Figure 2). Diurnal fluctuations are considerably more subtle than those measured with the WCR probes. At least two factors may account for these differences. First, the pressure transducers associated with the tensiometers are calibrated to account for non-isothermal conditions using the method described by Lacher (1996). While both WCR probes and tensiometers' pressure transducers are installed below the ground surface to minimize temperature fluctuations, temperature may still affect the calibration of both instruments (Lacher, 1996 and Warrick et al., submitted 1997). However, the instruments' proximity to different plant roots may reflect diurnal evapotranspiration in the cottonwood-willow forest gallery of the SPRNCA. | |
The response of the tensiometers to increases in stream stage appears slower than the WCR probes, but the two graphs cannot be compared directly because they represent data from opposing river banks. However, it can be noted from Figure 6 that the 6.0 feet-deep tensiometers (6.0 D and E) - regardless of their lateral proximity to the river - respond more quickly to the rises in river stage than the tensiometers at 6.5 feet depth (6.5 D and F). This may be a function of soil texture, which was recorded during the installation process, but has not yet been factored into the interpretation of the results. Note that tensiometer 6.0 D showed a response to the increased stream stage prior to 6.0 E, which is further from the river by approximately 1.5 meters. A similar response can be noted in tensiometers 6.5 D and 6.5 F, respectively. | |
| |
| |
|
Return to AMS Posters, Table of Contents