SALSA Poster:

EVALUATION OF THE SIB SURFACE SCHEME IN A SEMI-ARID REGION, Harlow et al.

Return to AMS Posters, Table of Contents


EVALUATION OF THE SIB SURFACE SCHEME IN A SEMI-ARID REGION


Chawn Harlow, James J. Toth and W. James Shuttleworth

University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona

email: chawn@hwr.arizona.edu


EOS Semi-Arid Interstorm Model

  • Goal: Diagnosis of evapotranspiration
  • Components:
    • Analyzed large-scale tendencies and BC’s (ETA)
    • Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS)
    • Data Assimilation
  • Diagnostic, continuous model run
  • Near real-time on PC workstation
  • Current focus: San Pedro Basin
  • Current work:
    • Evaluate surface-vegetation atmospheric transfer (SVAT) schemes for data assimilation
      • SiB2c
    • Assimilate observed shortwave radiation (Poster 2.2)
  • http://www.hwr.arizona.edu/IS


san pedro area mapSiB2c--RAMS Coupling

  • SiB2c replaces standard SVAT of RAMS
  • Run over semi-arid region of 220 x 220 km2
  • Vegetation Parameterization
    • Choose four cover types to represent range of vegetation types in the model domain
      • C4 grassland, conifer, shrub, riparian, and bare soil


vegetation parameters

 

 

 

Why SiB2c?

  • Sellers, et al. 1996
  • Modern canopy photosynthesis-conductance model
  • Established relationships between vegetation index and vegetation parameters


patchy coverWhy Use Patchy Cover?

  • Affects surface energy balance and effective radiometeric temperature
  • Evenly distributed canopy unrealistic in this environment
  • Remotely sensed products to be assimilated
    • Solar radiation
    • surface temperature
  • Postulate patchy cover
    • Each pixel contains a mixture of one of the above vegetation types and bare soil


SiB2c Surface Temperatures


Model Calibration

  • Spatially distributed model
  • Point observations
  • 47 SiB2c parameters
    • expect high degree of parameter interaction
    • hand calibration / physical arguments lead to success in case of high temperature inhibition
    • select several ‘important’ parameters
      • still a very tough problem


SiB2c High Temperature Inhibition

  • Lucky Hills
  • Summer 1996 comparison study (Houser et al., this issue)
  • Critical temperature for ET cutoff increased from 310 K to 320 K


Example Output

example output


Future Work

  • Assimilate additional sources of remotely sensed data
    • Surface temperature
    • adapt SiB2c’s time-varying FPAR
  • Evaluate more realistic aggregation algorithms
  • Model calibration


Acknowledgement

Primary funding for this research was provided under the Sorooshian/Kerr NASA-EOS Interdisciplinary Science Project concerned with the hydrology in semi-arid environments (project number NAGW-2425).

 

Return to AMS Posters, Table of Contents

 

return togo homehomepage

Semi-Arid Land-Surface-Atmosphere (SALSA) Program


Copyright © 1998 United States Department of Agriculture
Agricultural Research Service, Southwest Watershed Research Center.

For more information.
Last modified: 25 Mar 98